Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To use the Information icon…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Information icon (an i in a circle) will give you valuable information about PEP Web data and features. You can find it besides a PEP Web feature and the author’s name in every journal article. Simply move the mouse pointer over the icon and click on it for the information to appear.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Menaker, E. (1988). Early Struggles in lay Psychoanalysis: New York in the Thirties, Forties, and Fifties. Psychoanal. Rev., 75(3):373-379.

(1988). Psychoanalytic Review, 75(3):373-379

Early Struggles in lay Psychoanalysis: New York in the Thirties, Forties, and Fifties

Esther Menaker

I cannot begin this paper without reiterating what you undoubtedly know: Freud wrote The Question of Lay Analysis in defense of Theodor Reik who was being sued by a patient as a “quack.” Reik, of course, survived that suit, as well as Hitler's Europe. He came to the United States, only to be denied membership in the psychoanalytic community. Freud's brilliant brief on so-called “lay-analysis” did not legitimize Reik to the New York Psychoanalytic Society. These medical analysts operated on a principle of selective orthodoxy in which the economic motive superceded the tenets of Freud's thinking. But Reik turned adversity into a productive enterprise — namely the training of nonmedical analysts, the founding of NPAP. Thus, in celebrating Freud's treatise we are indirectly celebrating our own origins. But this is a tale of the forties and I am ahead of my story.

I am grateful for this opportunity to present some living history of the past half century of psychoanalysis to you; for indeed not only has the world of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy changed, but the cultural climate of the world as a whole is so different from the way it was in the thirties that I myself am sometimes startled by the fact that in one lifetime I have experienced so much change. In the late twenties when I was still a college student and had majored in the hard sciences, I became interested toward the end of my undergraduate studies in the humanities and especially in psychology. But while the courses were of some interest, they were limited and barren of any concern for the deeper processes of human emotion, conflict, will, or imagination.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.