Are you having difficulty reading an article due its font size? In order to make the content on PEP-Web larger (zoom in), press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the plus sign (+). Press Ctrl (on Windows) or ⌘Command (on the Mac) and the minus sign (-) to make the content smaller (zoom out). To go back to 100% size (normal size), press Ctrl (⌘Command on the Mac) + 0 (the number 0).
Another way on Windows: Hold the Ctrl key and scroll the mouse wheel up or down to zoom in and out (respectively) of the webpage. Laptop users may use two fingers and separate them or bring them together while pressing the mouse track pad.
Safari users: You can also improve the readability of you browser when using Safari, with the Reader Mode: Go to PEP-Web. Right-click the URL box and select Settings for This Website, or go to Safari > Settings for This Website. A large pop-up will appear underneath the URL box. Look for the header that reads, “When visiting this website.” If you want Reader mode to always work on this site, check the box for “Use Reader when available.”
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Frank, G. (1990). The Freudian Paradigm: Toward Paradigm Change in Psychoanalysis. Donald P. Spence. New York: Norton, 1987, 230 pp.. Psychoanal. Rev., 77(4):617-620.
(1990). Psychoanalytic Review, 77(4):617-620
The Freudian Paradigm: Toward Paradigm Change in Psychoanalysis. Donald P. Spence. New York: Norton, 1987, 230 pp.
Review by: George Frank, Ph.D.
Donald Spence, both psychologist and psychoanalyst, joins here the ever-increasing number of people writing critical commentaries on Freud's theory. Spence's book is a summary and extension of his previous writing as well as a summary and extension of the work of others.
Each critic of Freud's theory chooses some facet of the theory on which to focus their attention. Some criticize a particular explanatory principle Freud used (e.g., the energetic principle, instinct theory, the Oedipus complex, etc.), while others focus on some personal aspect of Freud's that they believe influenced his theorizing (e.g., some element of his personality, his familial upbringing, his cultural upbringing, his predilection for biological and archaeological metaphors, his commitment to Darwinian biology and Helmholtzian physicalism, etc.). Spence is one of those who criticize Freud's theorizing, but he does so in a rather unique way: He criticizes the validity of Freud's conclusions by criticizing how Freud came to his conclusions.
Freud was, one might say, driven to have psychoanalysis considered a science. Since he was the only one developing this “science,” he had to assert that the way he developed his ideas was objective and “scientific.” This is exactly what Spence challenges. In a previous book, Spence (1982) commented that while Freud believed that he had arrived at scientific “truth,” Freud had actually achieved what Spence called “narrative truth,” that is, “plausible explanations.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]