Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see statistics of the Most Popular Journal Articles on PEP-Web…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Statistics of the Most Popular Journal Articles on PEP-Web can be reviewed at any time. Just click the “See full statistics” link located at the end of the Most Popular Journal Articles list in the PEP Section.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Fancher, E. (1993). Discussion. Psychoanal. Rev., 80(2):217-220.

(1993). Psychoanalytic Review, 80(2):217-220

Discussion

Edwin Fancher

I am really pleased to be invited to discuss papers by two of the most creative and productive psychoanalytic educators of the past several decades. Both Jacob Arlow and Martin Bergmann have been an inspiration to me and to many of you.

Each author approaches the topic, “The Future of Psychoanalytic Training: Contemporary Issues and Controversies,” from a very different point of view, yet both men view psychoanalytic training in relation to a serious crisis in the profession of psychoanalysis itself at this historical point.

Arlow's approach focuses on the need to revise and update curricula. He emphasizes the need to put Freud and his writings in historical perspective. We should use Freud to teach “the interplay between clinical observation and theoretical formulations.” Arlow's emphasis is on Freud's contribution to the scientific methodology of psychoanalysis. He recommends that we study all of the schools from Adler and Jung to the present dissident groups, not as movements but from the point of view of the scientific methodology of psychoanalysis. He reminds us that “in psychoanalysis our instrument is the psychoanalytic situation and the technique of free association.” He emphasizes that the “text of the patient's associations” provides the data for formulating a scientific basis for psychoanalysis. He makes a strong plea for the early introduction in the training program of comprehensive training in the methodology of psychoanalysis. This is to be achieved in courses that focus on “the precise, textual analysis of process notes.”

Arlow

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.