Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: PEP-Web Archive subscribers can access past articles and books…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you are a PEP-Web Archive subscriber, you have access to all journal articles and books, except for articles published within the last three years, with a few exceptions.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Herron, W.G. Javier, R.A. (1996). The Psychogenesis of Poverty: Some Psychoanalytic Conceptions. Psychoanal. Rev., 83(4):611-620.

(1996). Psychoanalytic Review, 83(4):611-620

The Psychogenesis of Poverty: Some Psychoanalytic Conceptions

William G. Herron, Ph.D. and Rafael A. Javier

This paper offers some comments about a psychoanalytic understanding of poverty. Parsimony is dictated by two facts. First, psychoanalysis has had little to say about the subject in the past, so there is no body of clinical data or direct theory upon which to build. Then, poverty is a very complex issue with a full complement of contradictions, misunderstandings, stereotypes, and confusions. However, poverty is also a persistent problem throughout the world, and acute in lands of plenty, such as the United States (Maharidge, 1991). The need for explanations and remedies is ever apparent, despite many having been offered, tried, and stumbled over, recreating the need for new beginnings. Most approaches have been without psychoanalytic influence or input, so there is an urgency to approach this issue.

Poverty is usually thought of as being within the domains of economics and politics, and Rendon (1991) has noted that, with few exceptions, psychoanalysts have avoided both. Mainstream psychoanalytic theory, and practice even more so, has been prominently concerned with the middle class. At the same time, the influence of psychoanalysis on the entire society has been impressive in many ways, raising hopes for more extensive benefits. An example of this is Freud's expressed hopes for the applications of psychoanalysis (1933). The possibilities reinforce the idea that poverty could only be better understood if subject to psychoanalytic scrutiny.

Freud (1913, 1917) may have inadvertently set the tone for relative neglect. Although generous of spirit in many ways, at best he appeared ambivalent about the poor, and poverty was not one of his main social issues.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.