Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see papers related to the one you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are articles or videos related to the one you are viewing, you will see a related papers icon next to the title, like this: RelatedPapers32Final3For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are related (including the current one). Related papers may be papers which are commentaries, responses to commentaries, erratum, and videos discussing the paper. Since they are not part of the original source material, they are added by PEP editorial staff, and may not be marked as such in every possible case.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kline, T.J. (1997). Bertolucci's Stealing Beauty. Psychoanal. Rev., 84(1):149-152.

(1997). Psychoanalytic Review, 84(1):149-152

Film Notes

Bertolucci's Stealing Beauty

T. Jefferson Kline, Ph.D.

The double has always lurked at the heart of Bertolucci's cinematic enterprise, sometimes explicitly as in his early Partner (1968), in the Paul-Tom configuration in Last Tango in Paris, or in the Alfredo-Olmo brotherhood of 1900, at other times implicitly, as in the Jesse-Siddhartha twinning of Little Buddha. With Stealing Beauty comes a film in which doubles are more clearly configured with characters outside rather than within the cinematic space.

When I viewed the film at the American premiere in New York, the Italian Office of Tourism was cravenly attempting to bill the film as a plug for vacations in the beautiful Tuscan countryside. But the film is hardly that; especially since Mr. Bertolucci parted ways with Vittorio Storraro for this venture, and the Tuscan hills are never quite captured so much as they are grazed by a somewhat distracted camera. It is as though Mr. Bertolucci wanted to force our eyes back from the Italian landscape to a more intimate view of a disparate and desperate collection of exiles grouped around the figures of Ian Grayson (Donal McCann), a middle-aged sculptor, and Diana (Sinead Cusack), his fragilely beautiful wife. Their Tuscan villa has attracted such unlikely companions as the aging and apparently senile M. Guillaume, played by Jean Mantis, a ghostly reminder of his former roles in Cocteau's Orpheus and Beauty and the Beast; a wasted but still powerfully emotional Alex Parrish (Jeremy Irons), his lungs expectorating, his heart still expectant; and the fiercely sexual and intellectually vapid D. W. Moffat (Richard Reed) trying to convince us that this is “Last Tango in Paradise.” It is as though Bertolucci and Susan Minot, author of the screen play, had transposed Chekhov's Cherry Orchard into “The Olive Grove” where everyone seems to suffer from an incurable case of fin de siecle ennui, sadness and failure to communicate real feelings.

But a cure appears, almost as a dea ex machina, in the unlikely persona of a true romantic, an innocent, nay the idealization of all innocence, Lucy (Liv Tyler), an American virgin, in search, like the young poet Bernardo thirty years before her, of mystery.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.