Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Eigen, M. (2001). Mysticism And Psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. Rev., 88(3):455-481.

(2001). Psychoanalytic Review, 88(3):455-481

Mysticism And Psychoanalysis

Michael Eigen, Ph.D.

Psychoanalysis is officially nonmystical or antimystical. It sticks pins in mystical bubbles. It understands mystical states as remnants of infantile experience, expressions of primitive drives and structures. Yet—as with so much in life—there are complexities and countertendencies. There seem to be mystical aspects to psychoanalysis and there seem to be mystical psychoanalysts, or analysts tinged with spiritual interests. Freud would have viewed this as regressive. He saw religion as a last great hurdle in freeing man's mind for scientific inquiry. Men resort to religion to assuage a sense of helplessness, a heritage of infantile dependency. One wishes for a good outcome of what is a very fragile and rocky existence. Beatific promises soothe our fears.

On the one hand, mystical states may be related to what Freud (1930) terms “primary ego-feeling,” a sense of all-embracing, limitless I-feeling, including an “intimate bond between the ego and the world around it” (p. 68). Here there is expanded boundary, sense of infinite inclusion, “oceanic feeling.” On the other hand, Freud (1941) notes, “Mysticism is the obscure self-perception of the realm outside the ego, of the id” (p. 300). Here the ego is more contracted, separate, “shrunken,” taken aback by what is outside it.

Federn (1957), working with psychosis, picked up on boundary issues in Freud's thought. He was fascinated with the observation that the I contracts and expands, including more or less of the world, body, and mind in its movements and identifications. The I and not-I keep shifting. Even the I and me-feeling can drop away as consciousness ticks on.

One

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.