Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To download the bibliographic list of all PEP-Web content…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Did you know that you can download a bibliography of all content available on PEP Web to import to Endnote, Refer, or other bibliography manager? Just click on the link found at the bottom of the webpage. You can import into any UTF-8 (Unicode) compatible software which can import data in “Refer” format. You can get a free trial of one such program, Endnote, by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Satow, R. (2003). Transference: Shibboleth or Albatross? By Joseph Schachter. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, 2002, 267 pp.. Psychoanal. Rev., 90(5):761-763.

(2003). Psychoanalytic Review, 90(5):761-763

Books

Transference: Shibboleth or Albatross? By Joseph Schachter. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press, 2002, 267 pp.

Review by:
Roberta Satow

Joseph Schachter begins with a quote from Jack Streit's obituary. “Why is Streit's Matzoh different from all other domestic brands? Because Streit's bakes only Streit's Matzoh in our own ovens.” Jack Streit considered the tradition inviolable. Schachter credits Streit with understanding that tradition keeps the business alive. Similarly, Schachter argues that the core principles of transference and transference interpretation distinguish psychoanalysis from other brands of therapy—it is the shibboleth of psychoanalysis. He contends that the traditional concept of transference is neither theoretically viable nor clinically useful, but it keeps the business alive. The only reason psychoanalysts do not give up is because it is a common belief system that protects us from uncertainty and doubt about the efficacy of our work.

Schachter does an exhaustive critique of Freud's concept of transference. Freud believed that transferences were psychological experiences that originated in childhood and are revived in psychoanalysis and experienced toward the psychoanalyst. Schachter rejects the etiological theory of the cause of these feelings and fantasies. He accepts the notion that patients experience unrealistic and/or irrational feelings and fantasies about the analyst, but he does not know the cause. Rather than calling these feelings and fantasies “transference,” Schachter calls them “habitual relationship patterns.” He feels the name change is important because transference implies childhood etiology. He wants to rid us of the shibboleth of “transference” because, he argues, it is actually an albatross.

Schachter painstakingly reviews studies that do not lend credence to the hypothesis of infant or child determinism. For example, he reports the results of a study by De Bellis (2000, p. 79) that reports that forty-two to forty-eight percent of children who were sexually abused developed posttraumatic stress disorder, but the majority did not. Schachter points out that there are confounding factors such as parental alcohol or substance abuse, socioeconomic status, and intelligence.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.