Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:


Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Varga, M.P. (2005). Analysis of Transference as Transformation of Enactment. Psychoanal. Rev., 92(5):659-674.

(2005). Psychoanalytic Review, 92(5):659-674

Analysis of Transference as Transformation of Enactment

Michael P. Varga, Ph.D.

In the course of conducting hypnosis to resolve his patients' hysterical symptoms, Freud discovered that limits on their cooperation were set by their tendencies to transfer onto him sexual and/or negative feelings and attitudes related to significant others. Rather than allowing this to remain an obstacle, Freud seized on a brilliant, creative idea, which spawned a whole psychotherapeutic discipline, psychoanalysis: namely, that psychopathology could be most effectively resolved through analyzing this transference onto the analyst of pathogenic ideas and feelings. Implicit in this approach from the beginning, and increasingly clear and explicit via recent theoretical advances, is that analysis of transference is a complex transformational process, entailing the analyst's interactive, intersubjective engagement with the patient.

The classic formulation of analysis of transference as a complex transformational process is that of Strachey (1934). The analyst is seen as providing transformation by way of interrupting the patient's “neurotic vicious circle” through “mutative transference interpretation” (p. 346). In essence, the patient's transference toward the analyst is conceptualized as a superego projection onto the analyst. To the extent that the analyst responds to this projection with understanding, conveyed through a transference interpretation, rather than reacting in a way that confirms the projection, the patient introjects the understanding attitude of the analyst as a modification of his superego.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.