Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To share an article on social media…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

If you find an article or content on PEP-Web interesting, you can share it with others using the Social Media Button at the bottom of every page.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Schwartz, C. (2009). Language as Artistry: In the Treatment of a Borderline Psychotic Patient. Psychoanal. Rev., 96(1):1-20.

(2009). Psychoanalytic Review, 96(1):1-20

Language as Artistry: In the Treatment of a Borderline Psychotic Patient1

Charlotte Schwartz

I propose to examine the process by which the therapist experiences difficulties in selecting, from a multitude of ideas, a specific one that conveys a particular meaning for the patient. This, of course, necessitates an inner exploration to find the right words that can translate the idea into a meaningful experience both emotionally and cognitively. Poland (1986) noted that it is precisely “through words that an analysis comes to life, has power, and becomes a talking cure” (p. 244). Language thus assumes the “importance of major and powerful action” (Poland). It is the “wide range of the analyst's words” that can contribute to the “maintenance of the regressive and analytic nature of the dyadic balance” (Poland). Glover (1955) indicated that through our words we “supply word bridges” (pp. 132-133) that establish communication between the unconscious and the preconscious systems; speech is therefore our fundamental communicative link to the patient (Loewstein, 1956).

My case discussion will focus on the confluence of thought and words, and the difficulty in transmuting thoughts into meaningful language that is acceptable to the patient. Further, I will address the sublimatory process in the analyst and the artistry involved in our use of language.

Greenberg (2002) called attention to the problems of the “analyst's tension” in the analytic work. He noted that tension is omnipresent in the analyst at every step of the therapeutic process. This tension is rooted in the dichotomy between “analytic goals” that is, ideal theoretical constructs, and the praxis of therapeutic engagement.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.