Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To save a shortcut to an article to your desktop…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The way you save a shortcut to an article on your desktop depends on what internet browser (and device) you are using.

  • Safari
  • Chrome
  • Internet Explorer
  • Opera


For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Frank, G. (2011). The Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Frequency of Sessions: The Root of the Controversy. Psychoanal. Rev., 98(1):1-10.

(2011). Psychoanalytic Review, 98(1):1-10

Psychoanalytic Education

The Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Frequency of Sessions: The Root of the Controversy

George Frank

I work with my patients every day except on Sundays and public holidays—that is, as a rule, six days a week. (Freud, 1913, p. 127)

Freud only modified the six-day schedule to five in order to accommodate into his existing practice the people who had started coming to him for a “training analysis(Kardiner, 1977).

When Freud (1912, 1913) wrote about the specifics of his technique, he referred to them as “technical rules” (1912, p. 111). Thus in 1922, when the International Psychoanalytcal Association (IPA) formalized the definition of “psychoanalysis” as a form of treatment, it defined it as a process that involved five sessions per week, as did the early textbooks on psychoanalysis (e.g., Fenichel, 1945; Greenson, 1967; Menninger, 1958). Psychoanalysts who worked in Europe and South America employed the five-day-a-week schedule; however, psychoanalysts in the United States began to experiment with different schedules. Some retained the five-day-a-week schedule; some reduced the number to four, some reduced the number even more.

In spite of the fact that when Freud worked he always saw patients on a daily basis, it must also be recognized that when he wrote about why he did so, he did not offer a theoretical rationale for the daily sessions; instead, Freud wrote:

… this technique is the only one suited to my individuality, I do not venture to deny that a physician quite differently constituted might feel himself driven to adopt a different attitude to his patients and the task before him. (1912, p.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.