Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from pepeasy.pep-web.org. You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:

On IOS:

  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Gavriele-Gold, J.R. (2011). The Human—Canine Bond: New Learnings and a Changing Rationality from a Psychoanalytic Perspective. Psychoanal. Rev., 98(1):91-105.
  

(2011). Psychoanalytic Review, 98(1):91-105

Original Articles: Invited Paper

The Human—Canine Bond: New Learnings and a Changing Rationality from a Psychoanalytic Perspective

Joel R. Gavriele-Gold, Ph.D.

A changing rationality about the human—canine bond has begun slowly to emerge as new forms of knowledge become popularized regarding the unique relationship between dogs and people. Sadly, many age-old misperceptions and myths about this bond are perpetuated as much by academics as by publishers of dog magazines, breeders, dog trainers, walkers, and humane society attendants. Many academics and psychotherapists continue to adhere to (what I term) “Freudian substitution theory.” As originally expounded by Freud's followers, the human—canine relationship is regarded as a substitute for other human relationships. Most often, the inference is that human relationships with dogs substitute for those with human mates and/or children; these bonds with pets are assumed to be inferior relationships to “real” relationships with people. As a result of the widespread belief in the Freudian substitution theory, many analysts have pathologized their patients' relationships with their animals, and, in some instances, pathologized their own. In contrast, Gerry Genosko's (1993) work on Freud's ideas on dogs and humans has in part positively influenced my own findings.

James

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.