Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To quickly return to the issue’s Table of Contents from an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can go back to to the issue’s Table of Contents in one click by clicking on the article title in the article view. What’s more, it will take you to the specific place in the TOC where the article appears.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Mahony, P. (1975). The Interpretation of Dreams, Semiology, and Chomskian Linguistics—A Radical Critique. Psychoanal. St. Child, 30:221-241.

(1975). Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 30:221-241

The Interpretation of Dreams, Semiology, and Chomskian Linguistics—A Radical Critique

Patrick Mahony, Ph.D.

IN HIS VERITABLE PIONEERING MONOGRAPH MARSHALL EDELSON (1973) rightly sees Freud the dream theorist as the forerunner of modern semiology. Accordingly, Edelson specifies that when "Freud describes the dream as a kind of rebus, he is clearly concerned, and perhaps the first semiologist to state the problem so explicitly, with the translation of the symbolic forms of one symbolic system into those of another symbolic system" (p. 252), i.e., the translation of the verbosymbolic latent dream into the predominant visuality of the manifest dream. Edelson's own guiding interest is to harmonize Freudian and Chomskian tenets, to establish an isomorphism between linguistic deep and surface structures and the dual structure of oneiric activity.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.