Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To search for text within the article you are viewing…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can use the search tool of your web browser to perform an additional search within the current article (the one you are viewing). Simply press Ctrl + F on a Windows computer, or Command + F if you are using an Apple computer.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Balsam, R.H. (1994). Rational and Irrational: Remarks on the Clinical Gendering of Language in Psychoanalysis. Psychoanal. St. Child, 49:145-158.

(1994). Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 49:145-158

Clinical Contributions

Rational and Irrational: Remarks on the Clinical Gendering of Language in Psychoanalysis

Rosemary H. Balsam

This paper extends Hartmann’s skepticism about the heuristic value of the polarized terms “rational” and “irrational” lest they be used for future theory building. Clinically—now, as in ancient times—a close correlation exists between this polarity and that of common-parlance value judgments—“masculine/rational/positive” and “feminine/ irrational/negative.” Primitive ambivalence concerning the repudiation of femininity is explored here in both sexes. A suggestion is raised that it may be the female’s capacity for pregnancy, rather than the infantile reaction to genital difference, that is the most vital underpinning of the age-old negative view of women.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.