Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To refine search by publication year…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Having problems finding an article? Writing the year of its publication in Search for Words or Phrases in Context will help narrow your search.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Ikonen, P. Rechardt, E. (1993). The Origin of Shame and its Vicissitudes. Scand. Psychoanal. Rev., 16(2):100-124.

(1993). Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 16(2):100-124

The Origin of Shame and its Vicissitudes

Pentti Ikonen, Phil-Mag and Eero Rechardt, M.D.

Foreword

During recent years, it has been noted that shame is a neglected area in the theory and practice of psychoanalysis. Our clinical experience has drawn our attention to the subject. We have noticed that many psychoanalyses draw considerable profit from the identification of shame and dealing with it.

We shall present here our own view, that shame is a reaction to the absence of approving reciprocity. The basic form of shame is the stranger anxiety of an infant. When the infant trustingly reaches his arms toward an adult, and then notices that it is not his mother, he interrupts the approach, turns his head away, hides his face, and starts to cry. As development proceeds, the demand for reciprocity has become more defined: when the infant notices that he does not meet the mother's gaze which he had taken for granted, he is ashamed of his false expectation.

A Literary Survey

Literature describes many psychic states and incidents, which contain a particular predisposition for shame or are connected with the experience of shame. These descriptions vary, usually in accordance with the current phase of psychoanalytical thinking Abraham, 1913, Alexander, 1938; Erikson, 1963; Fenichel, 1945; Freud, 1905, 1926; Jacobson, 1954, 1964; Levin, 1971; Piers & Singer 1953; Rank (ref. Steinberg, 1991); Reich, 1960). According to traditional views, shame does not merit special attention nor a theory of its own, because it is an inseparable part of the relationship between the ego and the superego and the ego ideal.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.