Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To see translations of this article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

When there are translations of the current article, you will see a flag/pennant icon next to the title, like this: 2015-11-06_11h14_24 For example:

2015-11-06_11h09_55

Click on it and you will see a bibliographic list of papers that are published translations of the current article. Note that when no published translations are available, you can also translate an article on the fly using Google translate.

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Gullestad, S.E. (2007). “Thinking” — in a Psychoanalytic Perspective: Some Introductory Remarks. Scand. Psychoanal. Rev., 30(2):94-97.

(2007). Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 30(2):94-97

“Thinking” — in a Psychoanalytic Perspective: Some Introductory Remarks

Siri Erika Gullestad, Dr. Philos.

The theme of the XX Nordic Psychoanalytic Congress, Oslo, August 2006 was Thinking – in a psychoanalytic perspective. Now, thinking is generally not viewed as a primary occupation of psychoanalysis. Psychoanalysis comes forward first and foremost as a theory of unconscious motivation and fantasies, intra-psychic conflicts, affects and object-relations. However, thinking in the form of free associations, day-dreaming and fantasies are at the heart of psychoanalytic treatment, as well as regressive thought processes, faulty logic, primary processes and lack of mentalisation. At the clinical level, the analyst obviously deals with thought processes and pathology of thought. In the context of assessment, capacity for thinking and reflecting constitutes a crucial dimension. However, it seems warranted to say that exploration of cognitive processes seldom represents a theoretical main point in today's psychoanalytical articles.

At the former Nordic Psychoanalytic Congress which was held in Copenhagen in 2004, the theme was feelings and emotional life. this theme represented a challenge to a dialogue with contemporary affect theory. Likewise, the Scientific Committee of the XX Congress found that it would be a challenge for us as psychoanalysts to make explicit our understanding of thinking. the cognitive parts of human personality should be lifted to the foreground and subjected to systematic study from a psychoanalytic point of view. This will make possible a dialogue with cognitive psychology and – neuroscience, representing fields of research that have provided important scientific contributions in recent years, and also – if we want – with cognitive therapy, a treatment explicitly addressing the patient's thought processes.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.