Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To bookmark an article…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

Want to save an article in your browser’s Bookmarks for quick access? Press Ctrl + D and a dialogue box will open asking how you want to save it.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Strømme, H. Gullestad, S.E. (2012). Disclosure or Non-Disclosure? An In-Depth Study of Psychodynamic Supervision. Scand. Psychoanal. Rev., 35(2):105-115.

(2012). Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 35(2):105-115

Disclosure or Non-Disclosure? An In-Depth Study of Psychodynamic Supervision

Hanne Strømme and Siri Erika Gullestad

Contemporary supervision discussions often imply that non-disclosure may hinder the learning process of a supervisee. However, is disclosure always a benefit? What are the consequences of non-disclosure - or disclosure - for a student therapist's training? These questions are discussed through an in-depth analysis of longitudinal data from a single-case study of a student therapist conducting his first psychodynamic therapy. The perspectives of the student therapist, the supervisor, the patient and the research interviewer, are included as data, as well as an independent competence evaluation. The student therapist's non-disclosure of negative feelings towards the supervisor - and the supervisor's neglect of the student's inner drama - did not seem to affect his learning process, which progressed in a very constructive manner. Perhaps remaining silent was an expression of self-respect? With regards to the supervisor, it is assumed that recognition and acceptance of the student therapist's anxiety could have diminished the unfolding inner drama.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.