Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To use the Information icon…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

The Information icon (an i in a circle) will give you valuable information about PEP Web data and features. You can find it besides a PEP Web feature and the author’s name in every journal article. Simply move the mouse pointer over the icon and click on it for the information to appear.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Kotkavirta, J. (2017). Editorial. Scand. Psychoanal. Rev., 40(2):77-78.

(2017). Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 40(2):77-78

Editorial

Editorial

Jussi Kotkavirta

I

‘Fundaments and fundamentalism’ was the theme of the Nordic Psychoanalytic Congress 2016 in Stockholm. In the present issue we publish three of the papers read in the congress, by Johan Eriksson, Jussi Kotkavirta and Sverre Varvin. In these papers, and in several others presented in the congress, a kind of dialectic between fundaments and fundamentalism is articulated. Most generally it can be formulated as follows: it is vitally important to reflect constantly on the fundaments of one’s thinking, judging, valuing, behaving, to keep open a space for critical reflection, because otherwise one is in danger of committing into a fundamentalist mindset of some sort. In several presentations it was emphasized that this demand of self-reflection is vital for psychoanalysts and psychoanalysis, and such reflection was practiced in the congress.

II

Fundamentalism as a mass phenomenon is essentially connected with modernity, and in particular with its current late phase of global capitalism. Helmut Dubiel, a German sociologist in the Frankfurt school tradition, has captured this important connection well (Dubiel, 1992). The early project of enlightenment was questioned by romanticism, whereas the neo-romanticist reactionary ideologies and movements, fascism included, may be seen as critical responses against industrial capitalism. The contemporary global capitalism, which does not respect any cultural or other limits, is questioned above all by radical religious neo-traditionalisms, i.

[This is a summary excerpt from the full text of the journal article. The full text of the document is available to journal subscribers on the publisher's website here.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.