Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
Tip: To see Abram’s analysis of Winnicott’s theories…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

In-depth analysis of Winnicott’s psychoanalytic theorization was conducted by Jan Abrams in her work The Language of Winnicott. You can access it directly by clicking here.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Ferenczi, S. (1915). Letter from Sándor Ferenczi to Sigmund Freud, December 26, 1915. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi Volume 2, 1914-1919, 99-100.

Ferenczi, S. (1915). Letter from Sándor Ferenczi to Sigmund Freud, December 26, 1915. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi Volume 2, 1914-1919 , 99-100

Letter from Sándor Ferenczi to Sigmund Freud, December 26, 1915 Book Information Previous Up Next

Sándor Ferenczi

Pápa, December 26, 1915

Dear Professor,

I don't exactly know anymore which of your substantive letters I already answered; I think I owe you at least two replies.

My mother's illness, which has still not been overcome by any means, was a strong shock. And even so, I was—probably a proof of strong ucs. fixation—incapable of any positive tenderness toward her; I felt inhibited. One has to marvel again and again about the true immortality of the child in us.

I am getting more and more hopeful reports about my transfer; it is only a precautionary measure against disappointment when I am still not certain in the matter.

You write about Rank that he is moving to Cracow; now, I don't know: is he staying a soldier—or is he being exempted as a journalist?—Is he only going away for the duration of the war or for a specific period of time?

Jones's tendency to plagiarize is familiar to me; he once appropriated my essay on suggestion in a similar way.1 His originality is (as I know from the analysis) inhibited; for that reason he has to satisfy his ambition in this way. Despite all that, he is a good boy—only one has to correct him in this respect. [See also, by the way, his book on Hamlet2].3 Incidentally, a few days ago I received a letter from him, which I am enclosing.4 It is interesting in some respects. A miracle that the letter was able to pass through English and Austrian-Hungarian censorship.

I hope that Oli will also stand the test as a married man; but I concede that this union is not an everyday one.

The shortage of contributions for the Zeitschrift will certainly stimulate me to write. Here in Pápa I have cured a hysteric, who should almost be classified as a dementia. The seemingly silly person turned out to be a highly intelligent and sensitive personality. She has contributed much to raising the level of my sojourn in Pápa. I took great satisfaction in ascertaining how much better I now master transference and countertrans-ference.

Kind regards,


Notes to "Letter from Sándor Ferenczi to Sigmund Freud, December 26, 1915"

1 In Ferenczi's opinion Jones had plagiarized the former's theory of suggestion from “Introjection and Transference” (1909, 67) in “The Action of Suggestion in Psychotherapy,” Journal of Abnormal Psychology 5 (1910-11): 217-254.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2019, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.