Tip: To search for text within the article you are viewing…
PEP-Web Tip of the Day
You can use the search tool of your web browser to perform an additional search within the current article (the one you are viewing). Simply press Ctrl + F on a Windows computer, or Command + F if you are using an Apple computer.
For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.
Ferenczi, S. (1917). Letter from Sándor Ferenczi to Sigmund Freud, January 2, 1917. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi Volume 2, 1914-1919, 170-171.
Ferenczi, S. (1917). Letter from Sándor Ferenczi to Sigmund Freud, January 2, 1917. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi Volume 2, 1914-1919 , 170-171
Letter from Sándor Ferenczi to Sigmund Freud, January 2, 1917
Budapest, January 2, 1917
Grand Hôtel Royal
First, something about the case of Harmonia.
Mature reflection makes it highly questionable whether you ought to accede to this request—and if so, under what conditions.
You see, a few weeks ago Harmonia sponsored a whole series of evenings for a “psychological” hypnotist and prestidigitator by the name of Winterri, and the great interest of the public, which brought them much money, seems to have aroused their interest in psychology. Harmonia and Winterri are now associated concepts here; your name and psychoanalysis has now been added as a third association. So you should either not accept the invitation at all, or make the following stipulations:
1) A placard must appear with the words, “scientific-literary lectures,” in which all the experts who take part are named.
2) Your lecture must not be the first, but [should], if possible, be last of all, so that the time span between you and Winterri is increased.
3) The honorarium must not be under 2,000 crowns, because Harmonia earns very much on such an evening, and that much is now being paid for a Viennese expert to come here.
Ignotus, whom I also asked for advice, reacted immediately with “Winterri” and “Refusal.” He considers the stipulations I mentioned to be possibly acceptable.
I received “Dreams” with thanks; still haven't had time to read through the Lectures again.
I have been unwell for two days (influenza), had to stay home today (probably tomorrow as well). Otherwise, nothing important to write about myself.
So, I am making a solemn decision to collaborate on that nice plan (Lamarckism). I will consider your notes as a basis for the work. First I want to copy and send in the notes that I made on this theme. Then I will ask you to designate what is useful in them and to propose specifics about the division of labor.
You will be surprised how great a difference there is between my view of today and that expressed earlier about the case of Harmonia.
[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]