Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To sort articles by Rank…

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

You can specify Rank as the sort order when searching (it’s the default) which will put the articles which best matched your search on the top, and the complete results in descending relevance to your search. This feature is useful for finding the most important articles on a specific topic.

You can also change the sort order of results by selecting rank at the top of the search results pane after you perform a search. Note that rank order after a search only ranks up to 1000 maximum results that were returned; specifying rank in the search dialog ranks all possibilities before choosing the final 1000 (or less) to return.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Ferenczi, S. (1919). Letter from Sándor Ferenczi to Sigmund Freud, December 26, 1919. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi Volume 2, 1914-1919, 377-379.

Ferenczi, S. (1919). Letter from Sándor Ferenczi to Sigmund Freud, December 26, 1919. The Correspondence of Sigmund Freud and Sandor Ferenczi Volume 2, 1914-1919 , 377-379

Letter from Sándor Ferenczi to Sigmund Freud, December 26, 1919 Book Information Previous Up

Sándor Ferenczi

Budapest, December 26, 1919

Dear Professor,

1.) Status of the fund matter:

On the 24th Mayor Bódy received us (Béla Lévy and me). The audience was brief. He read aloud to us his letter directed to Toni, a copy of which I had already read; then the “report” of Dr. Wenhardt—director of the municipal Rochus Hospital.1 The report, approximately one and a half typewritten pages all told, was nothing but a quotation of Hoche's statements (sect, danger, etc.). The mayor said that he didn't mention this report in the letter to Toni because he wanted to spare the sick man. But on no account does that mean that he—as Toni indicates in his letter to him—has already made a favorable decision.—But in the end he assumed a somewhat more amicable tone; he is naturally inclined—so he says—rather to go along with the intentions which the creator of the fund “has taken into his head” (sic!). Only he has to cover himself and determine whether it has to do with appropriate goals. So I should submit a rejoinder. He also intends to ask others.—I told him: perhaps also Privy Councillor Moravcsik. Thereupon we parted.

Dr. Béla Lévy was shocked. He still didn't know that scientifically responsible men were capable of making such judgments without appropriate experience, as Hoche does. For that reason he asked me if I was so completely convinced by your teachings. I denied him an answer, from which he was able to surmise the nonsensical nature of the question and begged my pardon.—

In the afternoon I went to Moravcsik. I found him “buttoned up.”

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2020, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.