Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
PEP-Easy Tip: To save PEP-Easy to the home screen

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

To start PEP-Easy without first opening your browser–just as you would start a mobile app, you can save a shortcut to your home screen.

First, in Chrome or Safari, depending on your platform, open PEP-Easy from pepeasy.pep-web.org. You want to be on the default start screen, so you have a clean workspace.

Then, depending on your mobile device…follow the instructions below:

On IOS:

  1. Tap on the share icon Action navigation bar and tab bar icon
  2. In the bottom list, tap on ‘Add to home screen’
  3. In the “Add to Home” confirmation “bubble”, tap “Add”

On Android:

  1. Tap on the Chrome menu (Vertical Ellipses)
  2. Select “Add to Home Screen” from the menu

 

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Abend, S.M. (1999). Chapter 1: The Problem of Therapeutic Alliance. The Therapeutic Alliance, 1-16.

Abend, S.M. (1999). Chapter 1: The Problem of Therapeutic Alliance. The Therapeutic Alliance , 1-16

Chapter 1: The Problem of Therapeutic Alliance Book Information Previous Up Next

Sander M. Abend, M.D.

I have entitled this presentation “The Problem of Therapeutic Alliance,” because in it I will treat the concept of the alliance as a problematic aspect of the larger and far more elusive question of what makes analytic treatment move forward. Notice that I did not say, what makes an analytic treatment effective. Nevertheless, it seems to me unarguable that whatever factors enable the treatment to move ahead constitute essential contributors to a fruitful outcome, and therefore they deserve the most careful study. As I shall attempt to demonstrate, the issue is not simply a theoretical conundrum, but also has technical consequences of considerable practical significance.

Freud laid the cornerstone of the concept of a therapeutic alliance, although he did not speak of it in those terms, in his 1912 paper on “The Dynamics of Transference,” as a feature of his exposition of how he conceptualized neurosogenesis and the analytic method of treatment at that time. Friedman (1969), in an incisive and convincing study of the subject, observes that Freud did so in a not entirely successful effort to resolve a theoretical paradox concerning the patient's motivation, and Friedman goes on to expose the persistence of that paradox in the work of subsequent theorists.

It will be recalled that Freud had already discerned that the transference, as the vehicle for the expression of the patient's unconscious desires, supplies the underlying emotional force that binds the patient to the doctor, and hence commits him or her to the treatment process.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.