Customer Service | Help | FAQ | PEP-Easy | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
Tip: To sort articles by sourceā€¦

PEP-Web Tip of the Day

After you perform a search, you can sort the articles by Source. This will rearrange the results of your search, displaying articles according to their appearance in journals and books. This feature is useful for tracing psychoanalytic concepts in a specific psychoanalytic tradition.

For the complete list of tips, see PEP-Web Tips on the PEP-Web support page.

Boesky, D. (1991). Chapter 11: The Authors Respond. Conflict and Compromise: Therapeutic Implications, 173-217.

Boesky, D. (1991). Chapter 11: The Authors Respond. Conflict and Compromise: Therapeutic Implications , 173-217

Chapter 11: The Authors Respond Book Information Previous Up Next

Dale Boesky, M.D.

I welcome the opportunity to comment about the discussions by Dr. Vacquer and Dr. Ornstein because they illustrate an important phenomenon that lies at the center of many current and past disagreements about psychoanalytic theory. I refer to the imbalance between theoretic views and the clinical evidence which is adduced to support those views. Before proceeding I wish to explain that space limitations prevent me from commenting on the valuable discussions by Brenner and Bronstein which agree, in essence, with my position. I have chosen instead to focus on the substantive issues of disagreement.

The philosopher Abraham Friedman once commented dryly that it is useful to make some distinctions about the discourse of psychoanalysts. He suggested that we should carefully distinguish between what the psychoanalyst says to his patient, what he says to himself, and what he says to his colleagues. The differences between the three forms of discourse are not a matter of discretion or integrity. They result from the well-known fact that the relation between proclaimed theory and actual practice is notoriously unpredictable. So, when analysts disagree, one of them often implies that the other is fooling himself about what he claims to understand about a patient.

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2021, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.