Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Report a Data Error | About
:
Login
(1990). Chapter 13: The Authors Respond. Child and Adolescent Analysis: Its Significance for Clinical Work with Adults, 181-202.

Welcome to PEP Web!

Viewing the full text of this document requires a subscription to PEP Web.

If you are coming in from a university from a registered IP address or secure referral page you should not need to log in. Contact your university librarian in the event of problems.

If you have a personal subscription on your own account or through a Society or Institute please put your username and password in the box below. Any difficulties should be reported to your group administrator.

Username:
Password:

Can't remember your username and/or password? If you have forgotten your username and/or password please click here and log in to the PaDS database. Once there you need to fill in your email address (this must be the email address that PEP has on record for you) and click "Send." Your username and password will be sent to this email address within a few minutes. If this does not work for you please contact your group organizer.

OpenAthens or federation user? Login here.

Not already a subscriber? Order a subscription today.

(1990). Chapter 13: The Authors Respond. Child and Adolescent Analysis: Its Significance for Clinical Work with Adults , 181-202

Chapter 13: The Authors Respond Book Information Previous Up Next

Melvin A. Scharfman, M.D.

A number of interesting questions have been, raised by the discussants about the contributions from child to adult analysis. One issue raised was whether or not Melanie Klein really contributed very much with her emphasis on preoedipal attachments and as a stimulus to the beginning of object relations theory. Certainly her contributions long predated Freud's 1931 paper, “Female Sexuality”, and the other contributions cited. Whether or not object relations theory continues to find a prominent place in analytic theory, it seems to me that it cannot arbitrarily be excluded from a historical review.

A question was also raised about whether or not Anna Freud's work, The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence, really came from child analysis. Of course her work did not develop in a vacuum. She was familiar not only with her father's work but with the work of Alexander and Fenichel. However, her systematic organization and presentation of the operation of defenses throughout childhood and the enumeration of defense mechanisms is a contribution in and of itself. There is no doubt that it was a turning point which has deeply influenced analytic technique ever since. Her contributions to the elaboration of our understanding of prepuberty and puberty were also significant. Her clinical examples are from child analysis. While no child analyst has been without a background in adult analysis, our focus is on how child analytic work elaborates and specifies,

- 181 -

[This is a summary or excerpt from the full text of the book or article. The full text of the document is available to subscribers.]

Copyright © 2017, Psychoanalytic Electronic Publishing, ISSN 2472-6982 Customer Service | Help | FAQ | Download PEP Bibliography | Report a Data Error | About

WARNING! This text is printed for personal use. It is copyright to the journal in which it originally appeared. It is illegal to redistribute it in any form.